Monday, October 30, 2006

Rimi Tomy Bathing Mms

dint of progress, men away from Nature ...

What do we mean by "men"? Is it a gathering of men, similar to a stack of pieces of wood? No way! The world of humanity in time and space, is not that the sum of the individuals who compose it. It is - that is to say, it makes sense - through what they produce with their hands, mixing in a conflict of traditions, personal memories and collective accumulation of knowledge and rules organization between individuals and social groups.

Talking "men" is less meaningful than talking about human society in the making. Another point to clarify why say that it is an evil to depart from nature? The opposite would it not true? A man abandoned naked in the heart of the Amazon rainforest could there live more than a few hours? What civilization if the transition from gathering to agriculture, clans of hunters to town, that is to say a distance of continuous nature.

As for the idea of progress, it refers to a situation considered more profitable than the one we knew before. On this point there is no agreement that this new situation is better than that pre-existed. For some, the consumption is a blessing for others ... the contrary. Is globalization a good or a danger? To live better together, they all rely on tolerance, those on the inalienable right security. All they are confident of being right even if they do not have the same things behind the same words.

remains the question of the nature of the to humans. This is not just biological. The share of self-thinking is manifested by a continuous creation of material products and intellectual relationships that are not of nature but of man . From its origins, humanity is defined as beyond nature. Why bother now divert the binomial-man company this distance progressive with nature?

This clarification does not detract seriously questioning the ability of humans to govern themselves. This issue does not, directly, the relationship between man and nature, but humanity in its own.

Monday, October 23, 2006

Notes On Water Cooled V/s Air Cooled

Carpet Palace


China, Ningxia, early nineteenth century. Carpet Palace, 800 x 816 cm. € 80,000.

Ningxia Province, north China, is close to Inner Mongolia. The semi-arid plateaus of Aixa are conducive to the breeding of sheep. Oldest Chinese carpet from this region. Offered to the imperial court or Buddhist temples, they are particularly rare and sought after.
The decorations for the yard are drawn from the repertoire of symbols happy butterflies, lotus, fish, flowers, peonies, pheasants, not to mention the dragons ...

Wednesday, October 18, 2006

Zoophillia Viedeo Free

Information or propaganda? The brush

Etymologically, inform means "to shape . Thus, education is to shape the child to fit the world in which he lives. Aristotle (384-322 BC.) Explained that in the generation, the wife brought the matter and the human form. He informed undifferentiated flesh to form into a distinct individual.

Etymology and semantic merging - without the sense of drift that sometimes there is - this information means that shapes our knowledge of the outside world. That said, we must be mindful of the passive aspect of the information. It receives from outside something that we will, as the sculptor who gives to form a block of stone.

Propaganda etymologically means spreading with force. Pager (pangere) expresses the idea of pushing into the file (ground). Originally the term refers to ecclesiastical action to expand the realm of faith. Currently, it has a pejorative connotation in that it involves the use of all means to accept a view.

As seen, initially, information and propaganda are virtually synonymous. Whenever it comes to shaping the opinion of an individual. A difference remains, however. If the information relates to someone who is not conscious of being so modified , propaganda is seen as the will of an authority to impose certain statements.

short, it is more difficult to keep information as propaganda, especially since I can not do without knowing what is happening around me. So I have to abandon passivity and shape me (tell me) with the intellectual resources available to me, knowing that a part thereof was provided to me by education, custom and habits. In other words, I remain partly shaped by my environment.

Awareness of this initial passivity allows me to overcome ... but never completely. To do this, I wonder about the meaning of what I get for asking more than what I present as facts. Beyond a factual statement that is intended, I will seek the interpretations it can cause. In other words, the debate only way to inform me without being subjected to information-propaganda. This process must allow me with my means - that this type of exercise will not fail to develop - to evaluate the significance for me of what I present as fact.