Thursday, November 9, 2006

6co2 12h2o Light Energy

there an objective reality?

Speaking of happiness is an invitation to push open doors. The temptation is therefore to force blows to the originality of paradoxes and new ideas. We will stick to reason and to escape amazes hackneyed conventions. It applies, perhaps without much panache, to understand the meaning of a word as used but difficult to use.

Happiness, says the dictionary, is a state of satisfaction, resulting from a specific event, it is sought, or unexpected announcement. This definition does not make us forget the essential: happiness can not be commanded. It is neither imposed nor denied. Meanwhile, no one can say so and so is happy. By cons, recognize the devastation of its opposite is easy. Besides insidiously we are ready to screen it behind the air of happiness for many dress around their loved ones or the all-comers. Currently, it is true, the propensity of our fellows to be revealed for a yes or a no, at least to forget to take offense, highlights the ease with which it proclaims its states unfortunate.

Would it be easier to capture this thing that makes running so they could decline the conditions for its realization, that reveal its materiality. How to establish plans for conquest? In this regard, we are all Rastignac: "Between us, Paris! "Happiness exists. It is like that. Here's the recipe! The answer, we know it. On the one hand, happiness is the child of circumstances. On the other hand, when these occur, too often they do not produce the desired effect.

must distinguish between living conditions and the fact to feel it. How, subjectively, they experience sudden her fainting when they have completed the necessary efforts for its realization. Conversely, we noted that the darkest periods of life, the most challenging times do not necessarily preclude the intimate experience of happiness. This last observation allows some, especially for the privileged, to justify the lack of any concern for collective improvement. Why try to change the state of affairs, since he is not that interferes with happiness?

Everyone can live in modesty or the difficulty of his condition. Even in the worst moments, such as wars, children play, men and women love each other and make plans. No doubt, but our state of civilized us to believe that peace, growing prosperity, accepting the other, more developed, stronger culture and always will be more widely distributed more happy than not. If the policy does not provide happiness, it opens the way for a greater opportunity to know the attractions.

So my answer is it two proposals. I must try to live a good life, that is to say who can flourish, but not at the expense of others and without asking the idle question of happiness ... I have every chance let me - then - given the boot.

0 comments:

Post a Comment