The idea of contract is best understood through an expression synonymous: the obligation reciprocal. And why not mutual constraint? These two words are not they equivalent? Not quite. The constraint expresses an independent external pressure of my agreement or even my understanding of what causes it. The requirement, she is that insofar as the merits of the reasons I had enough, although the details of implementation do not always seem fair. So I the obligation to pay taxes. While I know that if I do not pay voluntarily, I am compelled to do so, including (to my regret?) That members of a community must contribute to its maintenance, otherwise it would cease exist. I agree that the use and importance of money so collected is another problem. In other words, if the person I am stubborn not to pay his taxes, even knows (with or without remorse) that flees its obligations.
The contract comes as a personal liability together with my knowledge of the requirement that the other contracting party to me. In fact, any contract quickly became a test for the individual who accepted it. More than reason, the expected benefits follow the disadvantages of any quid pro quo. At the initial feeling of euphoria, which grows even more the desire of the contract on the topic: I have the means, capabilities ... the good will succeed not so much the unexpected that the roughness of the lived, poorly evaluated in the initial optimism. Today, we are no longer the person we were yesterday. Tomorrow, even less. Each, over the years, more or less strongly, indeed, saw the difficulty of honoring these contracts as desired.
How to say emphatically: "I will maintain"? By virtue, in the Latin sense of the word. The contract, to survive, requires an effort that pushes the one I am now. In doing so, he dips my character develops my "virtue", that is to say what makes my humanity. That's true of marriage, desire for children with all that involves contractual, contract of employment, all those implicit weave our social ties. Initially, preferably, "they take for granted. Then time, stubborn rodent our ideals, our projects, our feelings, is his work. What have we to oppose him? Our virtue. It is not nothing, it rarely enough.
0 comments:
Post a Comment